NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Burns v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (EOD) [2011] NSWADTAP 25 Hearing dates: 15 April 2011 Decision date: 20 May 2011 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel - Internal Before: Appeal Panel comprised of: Judge K P O'Connor, President, G Furness SC, Judicial Member, Z Antonios, Non-judicial Member Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: EQUAL OPPORTUNITY - Appeal - Finding that impugned conduct did not constitute homosexual vilification within the terms of s 49ZT - nature of standard of proof - reference to 'capacity to incite' - held no errors - appeal dismissed - Anti-Discrimination Act 1977, s 49ZT Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Cases Cited: Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR 336 Bropho v. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (2004) 135 FCR 105 Burns v Laws (EOD) [2008] NSWADTAP 32 Carter v. Brown [2010] NSWADT 109 Catch The Fire Ministries Inc and Ors v Islamic Council of Victoria Inc and Anor [2006] VCSA 284 JM and JN v QL and QM [2010] NSWADT 66 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd -v- Kazak (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 35 Leach v R [2007] HCA 3; (2007) 232 ALR 325; (2007) 81 ALJR 598 Macedonian Teachers Association of Victoria Inc v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission & Anor [1998] FCA 1650 Morley & Ors v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] NSWCA 331 Qantas Airways Limited v Gama [2008] FCAFC 69 South Australia v Totani [2010] HCA 39 State of Victoria v Macedonian Teachers Association of Victoria [1999] FCA 1287 Z v University of A & Ors (No 7) [2004] NSWADT 81 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Burns (appellant) Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (respondent) Representation: R Lancaster SC (Appellant) K Eastman (Respondent) Surry Partners (Appellant) Baker & McKenzie (Respondent) File Number(s): 109062 Decision under appeal Citation: Burns v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2010] NSWADT 267 Date of Decision: 2010-11-10 00:00:00 Before: Equal Opportunity Division File Number(s): 091127
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate