NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Claudio Grizonic v Suzanne Ranken Suttor & ors; Dawn Wade v Suzanne Ranken Suttor [2011] NSWSC 471 Hearing dates: 10, 11 June & 17 September 2010 Decision date: 23 May 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Trustees entitled to moneys in court pursuant to trustees' indemnity. Moneys in court to be paid out to trustees. Judgment that defendant Suttor pay plaintiff Wade $38,813. Catchwords: PARTNERSHIP - dissolution and winding up - Wade claims to be creditor- whether debts incurred post dissolution by continuing partner carrying on partnership business necessary for winding up of partnership - assignment of debts at law under (NSW) Conveyancing Act, s 12 - plaintiff appointed agent for collection of certain debts - no absolute assignment of these debts - notification of certain assignments said to be given to creditor's solicitor - notice to solicitor is notice to client - notice by service of initiating processes. PAYMENTS INTO COURT - where funds paid in from sale of non-partnership asset pending outcome of accounting between partners - whether partnership creditor entitled to moneys paid in - fund solely to secure entitlements of partners on taking of partnership accounts - fund not to secure partnership liabilities - creditor has no proprietary entitlement to funds in court. TRUSTEES - Trustees appointed under Conveyancing Act s 66G to sell real property held in co-ownership by former partners - whether costs incurred by trustees in defence of proceedings unsuccessfully brought against them by beneficiary after trust terminated and property distributed incidental to administration of trust - termination of trust does not render defence of subsequent allegations of breach of trust other than incidental to administration - whether trustees disentitled to indemnity by failing to seek judicial advice - failure to seek advice does not disentitle - where trust property still identifiable and traceable - indemnity persists post termination of trust - trustees entitled to indemnity and lien over property. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 64(3) (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, s 12, s 66G (NSW) Partnership Act 1892, s 38 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.17, r 42.25 (NSW) Trustee Act 1925, s 59 Cases Cited: Balkin v Peck (1998) 43 NSWLR 706 Bovaird v Frost [2009] NSWSC 917 Butchart v Dresser (1853) 4 De GM & G 542; 43 ER 619 Cameron v Renouf (No 2) [2009] WASC 84 Cheesbrough v Thompson (1866) 5 SCR (NSW) 366 Drummond v Drummond [1999] NSWSC 923 Fay v Moramba Services Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 725 Grizonic v Suttor [2008] NSWSC 914 Hardoon v Belilios [1901] AC 118 Hewett v Court (1983) 149 CLR 639 In re Bourne [1906] 2 Ch 427 In re Llewellin; Llewlelin v Williams (1887) 37 Ch D 317 IRC v Graham's Trustees (1971) SLT 46 Islamic Council of South Australia v Australian Federation of Islamic Councils Inc [2009] NSWSC 211 Lemery Holdings Pty Ltd v Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd (2008) 74 NSWLR 550 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar the Diocesan Bishop of Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand (2008) 237 CLR 66 Magee v UDC Finance Ltd [1983] NZLR 438 Matthews v Ruggles-Brise [1911] 1 Ch 194 Martinali v Ramuz [1953] 1 WLR 1196 National Trustees Executors and Agency Co of Australasia Ltd v Barnes (1941) 64 CLR 268 Octavo Investments Pty Ltd v Knight (1979) 144 CLR 360 Pantzer v Wenkart (2006) 153 FCR 466 Re Beddoe, Downes v Cottam [1893] 1 Ch 547 Re Diplock; Diplock v Wintle [1948] 1 Ch 465 Ron Kingham Real Estate Pty Ltd v Edgar [1999] 2 Qd R 439 Shirlaw (Now Rogers) v Malouf (1989) 15 ACLR 641 Smith v Smith [1926] NZLR 311 Toyama Pty Ltd v Landmark Building Developments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 55 Trautwein v Richardson [1946] ALR 129 Vacuum Oil Co Pty Ltd v Wiltshire (1945) 72 CLR 319 Worrall v Harford (1802) 8 Ves Jun 4 Texts Cited: Ford & Lee, Principles of the Law of Trusts Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2003/087265: Claudio Grizonic (plaintiff) Suzanne Ranken Suttor (first defendant) Find a Flat Pty Ltd (second defendant) Dawn Wade (third defendant) Geoffrey McDonald (fourth defendant) Paul LeRoy (fifth defendant) 2009/287047 Dawn Wade (plaintiff) Suzanne Ranken Suttor (defendant) Representation: Counsel: A J Grant (Ms Suttor) J T Johnson (Trustees - LeRoy & McDonald) G C Jones (Ms Wade) Solicitors: M Gallego (Ms Suttor) Yates Beaggi Lawyers (Trustees) In person (Ms Wade) File Number(s): 2003/087265 2009/287047
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate