NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McMahon v Smith; Turner v Smith; and Smith v Smith [2011] NSWSC 487 Hearing dates: 24 February 2011; 25 February 2011; 4 April 2011 Decision date: 03 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Hallen AsJ Decision: (a) Being satisfied that each is an eligible person, I conclude that each of Mathew and Ebony has satisfied the jurisdictional threshold. In the case of Kristy, I am not so satisfied. (b) Order that Mathew receive a lump sum of $40,000 and that Ebony should receive a lump sum of $30,000. (c) Order that the proceedings commenced by Kristy be dismissed. (d) I stand the proceedings over to enable the parties to bring in short minutes dealing with these matters. At that time, unless the parties are able to agree, I shall deal with consequential orders to give effect to the orders for provision and the question of costs and whether those costs should be capped. Catchwords: Three proceedings heard together, with evidence in one, being evidence in the others - Plaintiff in first proceedings - son of the deceased - Plaintiff in second proceedings - former de facto wife of the deceased, and mother of the Plaintiff in the first proceedings - Plaintiff in third proceedings - daughter of the deceased with whom he had virtually no contact from shortly after the time of her birth - Defendant - widow of Deceased - Property held by the deceased and the Defendant as joint tenants Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Succession Act 2006 Succession Amendment (Family Provision) Act 2008 Wills, Probate & Administration Act 1898 Cases Cited: Alexander v Jansson [2010] NSWCA 176 Ball v Newey (1988) 13 NSWLR 489 (NSWCA, 18 June 1991, unreported) Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 Blyth v Spencer; Spencer v Neville [2005] NSWSC 653 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [1938] AC 463 Brown v Faggoter (NSWCA, 13 November 1998, unreported) Burton v Moss [2010] NSWSC 163 Campbell v Chabert-McKay [2010] NSWSC 859 Cetojevic v Cetojevic [2006] NSWSC 431 Challenger Property Asset Management Pty Ltd v Stonnington City Council [2011] VSC 184 Churton v Christian (1988) 13 NSWLR 241; [1988] NSWCA 23 Coates v National Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd & Anor (1956) 95 CLR 494 Coffey v Bennett [1961] VR 264 Collins v McGain [2003] NSWCA 190 Cooper v Dungan (1976) 50 ALJR 539 D'Albora v D'Albora [1999] NSWSC 468 De Winter v Johnstone (NSWCA, 23 August 1995, unreported), Devereaux-Warnes v Hall [No 3] [2007] WASCA 235; (2007) 35 WAR 127 Diver v Neal [2009] NSWCA 54 Durham v Durham [2010] NSWSC 389; [2011] NSWCA 62 Electricity Commission of NSW v Arrow (1994) 85 LGERA 418 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Fulop Deceased, Re (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Gibson v Haselgrove; Delmont v Haselgrove [2009] NSWSC 496 Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Hastings v Hastings [2010] NSWCA 197 John v John [2010] NSWSC 937 Lewis v Lewis & Anor [2001] NSWSC 321 McCosker v McCosker [1957] HCA 52; (1957) 97 CLR 566 McKenzie v Topp [2004] VSC 90 McLeod v Johns [1981] 1 NSWLR 347 Mansfield v Mansfield [2003] WASC 214 Marland (dec), Re [1957] VR 338 Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 Menzies v Marriott [2009] VSC 345 Nassim (dec), Re [1984] VR 51 Penfold v Perpetual Trustee [2002] NSWSC 648 Petschelt v Petschelt [2002] NSWSC 706 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales [1962] HCA 19; (1961) 107 CLR 9 Porthouse v Bridge [2007] NSWSC 686 Puckridge, Deceased, In the Estate of, (1978) 20 SASR 72 Robinson v Tame (NSWCA, 9 December 1994, unreported) Singer v Berghouse (No 2) [1994] HCA 40; (1994) 181 CLR 201 Skinner v Frappell [2008] NSWCA 296 Stern v Sekers; Sekers v Sekers [2010] NSWSC 59 Stott v Cook (1960) 33 ALJR 447 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Tsivinsky v Tsivinsky (NSWCA, 5 December 1991, unreported) Vigolo v Bostin [2005] HCA 11; (2005) 221 CLR 191 Walker v Walker (NSWSC, 17 May 1996, unreported) Wentworth v Wentworth [1992] NSWCA 268 Zirkler v McKinnon [2002] NSWSC 285 Texts Cited: Government Gazette No. 38 of 20 February 2009 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mathew McMahon (aka Turner) (Plaintiff) (2009/291280) Kristy Ann Turner (Plaintiff) (2009/291281) Ebony Smith (Plaintiff) (2011/48505) Clara Smith (aka Clara Gomes & Clara Evans) (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Sternberg (Plaintiff) (2009/291280 & 2009/291281) Mr J D Shaw (Plaintiff) (2011/48505) Mr D Flaherty (Defendant) Solicitors: Elias Gates & Associates (Plaintiff) (2009/291280 & 2009/291281) WA Baxter & Co (Plaintiff) (2011/48505) Quinn Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/291280; 2009/291281; and 2011/48505 Publication restriction:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate