NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Melham v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 121 Hearing dates: 23 May 2011 Decision date: 02 June 2011 Before: Macfarlan JA at 1 Johnson J at 2 Garling J at 3 Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Child pornography - Commonwealth and State offences - Whether mental illness material cause of crime - Whether aggravating factor errors affected sentence - Whether sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Hayek v R [2010] NSWCCA 139 Leach v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 73 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Poynder [2007] NSWCCA 157 R v Verdins [2007] VSCA 102 Stewart v R [2009] NSWCCA 152 Vuni v R [2006] NSWCCA 171 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Graeme Boyd Melham (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G. Walsh (Applicant) N. Adams (Respondent) Solicitors: Greg Walsh & Co (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/053892 Decision under appeal Citation: R v Graeme Boyd Melham Date of Decision: 2010-07-19 00:00:00 Before: Bennett DCJ File Number(s): 2009/053892
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate