NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Achilles MEZZADRI [2011] NSWCCA 125 Hearing dates: 2 March 2011 Decision date: 06 July 2011 Before: Hodgson JA at [1] Adams J at [6] Hall J at [39] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: Sentence appeal - firearm offences - relevance of reasons for possession of firearms - significance of inoperability - whether more extensive reasons are required for departing from standard non-parole period than for other discretionary decisions Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms and Dangerous Weapons Act 1973 Cases Cited: Basedow [2010] NSWCCA 76 Cromarty [2004] NSWCCA 54; 144 A Crim R 515 El-Chammas v R [2009] NSWCCA 154 R v Miria [2009] NSWCCA 68 R v Tory and Tory (2006) NSWCCA 18 R v Wong & Leung (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Thurgar (unreported, NSWCCA 17 December 1990) Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1987-8) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Applicant) Achilles Mezzadri (Respondent) Representation: Counsel J. Pickering (Applicant) T. Gartelmann (Respondent) Solicitors Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Applicant) Bruce J Peters Criminal Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/286828 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-10-28 00:00:00 Before: Williams DCJ File Number(s): 2009/286828
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate