NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: National Australia Bank Limited v Pasupati [2011] NSWSC 540 Hearing dates: 1 April 2011 Decision date: 09 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: BUDDIN J Decision: Order that trustees be appointed for the sale of the subject property. The parties are to bring in short minutes within seven days Catchwords: Real property - co-owner seeking sale of property pursuant to s 66G of the Conveyancing Act - proceedings on foot in the Family Court - whether current proceedings should be stayed as an abuse of process Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Cases Cited: Cain v Cain [2007] NSWSC 623 Callahan v O'Neill [2002] NSWSC 877 Chalhoub v Chalhoub [2005] NSWSC 572 Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 Matsen v Matsen [2008] NSWSC 135 Nullagine Investments Pty Limited v The Western Australian Club Incorporated (1993) 177 CLR 635 Ranger v Ranger [2009] QCA 226 Ross v Ross [2010] NSWCA 301 Spathis v Nanos [2008] NSWSC 418 Tory v Tory [2007] NSWSC 1078 Williams v Williams [1979] 1 NSWLR 376 Texts Cited: Land Law (6th Edition) Category: Principal judgment Parties: National Australia Bank Limited Kumareshwara Pasupati (First Defendant) (Respondent) Lukshmi King (Second Defendant) (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: M Lawson (Applicant) M Young (Respondent) Solicitors: Lloyd & Lloyd (Applicant) Bransgroves Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/294556
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate