NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: REBERGER v R [2011] NSWCCA 132 Hearing dates: 11 April 2011 Decision date: 10 June 2011 Before: Campbell JA at [1]; RS Hulme J at [97]; Hoeben J at [98] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal allowed. 3. Set aside the sentence in the court below. 4. In lieu thereof, sentence the Applicant to imprisonment for a non-parole period commencing on 31 May 2010 and expiring on 30 August 2012, with a balance of term expiring on 28 February 2014. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing- trial judge sentencing on incorrect factual basis - trial judge rejecting witness' evidence in the absence of cross-examination - significance of mental impairment to general deterrence - significance of mental impairment to specific deterrence - assessment of the objective seriousness of an offence - considerations beyond seriousness of injury to victim - nature of task required by ss 54A and 54B Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Caldwell v J A Neilson Investments Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 3; (2007) 14 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-724 Chapman v Hearse (1961) 106 CLR 112 Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v Palm Assets Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 234; (2009) 261 ALR 382 Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140 Paric v John Holland Constructions Pty Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 505 R v Baxter [2007] NSWCCA 237; (2007) 173 A Crim R 284 R v Douar [2005] NSWCCA 455; (2005) 159 A Crim R 154 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Letteri (NSWCCA, 18 March 1992, unreported) R v Mooney (Supreme Court of Victoria Full Court, 21 June 1978, unreported) R v Scognamiglio (1991) 56 A Crim R 81 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Sayin v R [2008] NSWCCA 307 Springer v R [2007] NSWCCA 289; (2007) 177 A Crim R 13 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ryan Michael Reberger (Appellant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel B Rigg (Appellant) PG Ingram SC (Respondent) Solicitors Legal Aid Commission (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/125154 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-05-31 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2009/125154
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate