NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MADUBUKO, Henry Ugo v R [2011] NSWCCA 135 Hearing dates: 8 June 2011 Decision date: 08 June 2011 Before: Hodgson JA at [1], [41]; Hoeben J at [39]; Grove AJ at [40] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Whether separate trials of co-accused should have been ordered - Applicable principles - Whether there was a significant risk that evidence inadmissible against one accused could have turned a potential acquittal into a conviction. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(1) Cases Cited: Evans v R [2006] NSWCCA 277 Friend v R [2007] NSWCCA 41 Gilbert v R [2000] HCA 15; (2000) 201 CLR 414 Kennedy v R [2008] NSWCCA 21; (2008) 181 A Crim R 185 KRM v R [2001] HCA 11; (2001) 206 CLR 221 R v Middis (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Hunt J, 27 March 1991, unreported) R v Pham [2004] NSWCCA 190 R v Piller (1995) 86 A Crim R 249 Symss v R [2003] NSWCCA 77 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Henry Ugo MADUBUKO (appellant) CROWN (respondent) Representation: Dr Bernard Glennon (appellant) David Jordan (respondent) David H Cohen & Co. (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2008/00008434004 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2008-11-05 00:00:00 Before: Judge J C Nicholson SC File Number(s): 2008/8434
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate