NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Westpac Banking Corporation v Velingos [2011] NSWSC 607 Hearing dates: 28 February 2011, 1 March 2011, 2 March 2011 Decision date: 22 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Schmidt J Decision: For the reasons given, I am satisfied that the cross-claim must be dismissed and the orders sought by Westpac made. The parties wish to be heard on the question of costs. I will make formal orders, once costs have been determined. Catchwords: CONTRACTS - cross-claims - Contracts Review Act 1980 - whether loan and mortgage unjust - no independent legal advice - elderly borrowers with limited command of English and no ability themselves to repay borrowings - experienced borrowers who had previously received legal advice and who understood and consented to increased borrowings - borrowers also appreciated and consented to risks involved in transaction - whether borrowers had the benefit of the money in issue - part of borrowings used to repay another loan - contract not unjust - whether relief would be granted if contract found unjust - relief would be refused - Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 - whether brokers engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct - passing on false information - implied disclaimer - misleading and deceptive conduct not established - whether brokers engaged in unconscionable conduct - not ensuring borrowers obtained independent legal advice - unconscionable conduct not established - loss claimed not established - cross-claims dismissed Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Contracts Review Act 1980 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Bridgewater v Leahy [1998] HCA 66; (1998) 194 CLR 457 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; (2004) 218 CLR 592 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447 Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Elkofairi v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [2002] NSWCA 413 Gardam v George Wills & Co Ltd (1988) 82 ALR 415 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kowalczuk v Accom Finance Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 343 Orix Australia Corp Ltd v Peter Donnelly Automotive Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 977 Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd v Cook [2006] NSWSC 1104 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41 Spina v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2009] NSWCA 206 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; (2004) 219 CLR 165 Yorke v Lucas [1985] HCA 65; (1985) 158 CLR 661 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Westpac Banking Corporation Limited (Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant) Ikey Velingos (First Defendant) Konstandinos Velingos (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Helen Velingos (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Ali Ghezelbash (First Cross-Defendant) United Mortgage Pty Ltd (Second Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr MBJ Lee with Mr J Hyde-Page (Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant) Mr A Crossland (Second and Third Defendants/Cross-Claimants) Mr DA McLure (First and Second Cross-Defendants) Solicitors: Henry Davis York (Plaintiff/Third Cross-Defendant) Craig Milne & Co (Second and Third Defendants/First and Second Cross-Claimants) Lander & Rogers Lawyers (First and Second Cross-Defendants) File Number(s): 2008/11810
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate