NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd v PT Ltd (No 2) PT Ltd v Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd [2011] NSWADT 152 Hearing dates: 11-15 May 2009, 18-22 May 2009, 14-17 September 2009 and 8-12 February 2010 Decision date: 22 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Retail Leases Division Before: P R Callaghan SC, Deputy President, N Fagg, Non-judicial Member, G Griffiths, Non-judicial Member Decision: 1. Order proceedings 065171 be dismissed. 2. Order in proceedings 085081, Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd is to pay P.T. Ltd $327,533.55 plus interest to date. 3. Order that the issue of costs is reserved. 4. Various directions made. Catchwords: Retail lease - shopping centre specialty shop - pre-lease misrepresentation - mall kiosks - incompletely executed lease - alteration to lease - obstruction of sight-lines and access to shop - covenant for quiet enjoyment - unconscionable conduct. Legislation Cited: Retail Leases Act 1994 Duties Act 1997 Cases Cited: AG v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 557 Armstrong-Jones Management Pty Ltd v Saies Bond Pty Ltd (RLD) [2007] NSWADTAP 47 Arndale (Kilkenny) Pty Ltd v Gaetjens (1970) 44 ALJR 434 Aspromante Pty Ltd v Zagari (2000) 9 BPR 17, 247 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No.2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 Davis v Sydney Foreshore Authority [2010] NSWADTAP 43 Horwood v Memocorp Australia Pty Ltd [2010] NSWADT 69 Hughes Bros Pty Ltd v Trustees of Roman Catholic Church Diocese of Sydney (1993) 31 NSWLR 91 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 O'Neill v Henry (RLD) 2010 NSWADTAP 40 Perhauz v SAF Properties Pty Ltd [2007] NSWADT 122 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister of Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Spathis v Hawave Investment Co. Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 304 Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd v P.T. Ltd [2007] NSWADT 130 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Sicard NSWSC 827 Wall's Gifts and Tobacco Pty Ltd v Warringah Mall Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADT 161 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd - Applicant in 065171 and Respondent in 085081
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate