NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Thoo v The Owners Strata Plan No. 50276 [2011] NSWSC 657 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18 and 24 August 2010 Decision date: 28 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: The defendant Owners Corporation in Strata Scheme 50276 found to have breached its duty in Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 s 62(2) by failing to provide sufficient exhaust ventilation capacity to the plaintiff's Lot 17 in such scheme. Resolution 7 at the 5 August 2009 AGM of Strata Plan 50276 declared invalid as failing to comply with Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 s 62(3). Inquiry as to damages ordered. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - Strata and related titles and occupancy - whether an owners corporation required to upgrade an exhaust ventilation system to service the needs of a lot owner - whether owners corporation allowing the lot owner to connect to the exhaust ventilation system but refusing to guarantee any particular level of exhaust ventilation to the lot was a breach of Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 ss 62 (1) and (2) - whether special resolution of owners corporation complied with Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 s 62 (3) so the provisions of ss 62(1) and (2) did not apply to the exhaust ventilation system - whether if otherwise validly passed the special resolution was a fraud on the minority - whether the plaintiff has suffered any loss as a result of any breach of Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 ss 62 (1) or (2). Legislation Cited: Conveyancing (Strata Titles) Act 1961 (NSW) Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW) Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW), s 62 Strata Schemes Management Amendment Act 2004 (NSW), s 65A Cases Cited: British Equitable Assurance Co Ltd v Baily [1906] AC 35 Bull v Bull [1955] 1 QB 234 Burns v National Coal Board [1957] SC 239 Carre v Owners Corporation - Strata Plan 53020 (2003) 58 NSWLR 302 Eventang Development (Pyrmont) Pty Limited v Owners Strata Plan 51573 [2001] NSWSC 452 Gambotto v WCP Limited (1995) 182 CLR 432 Goodtitle v Tombs (1770) 3 Wils 118; (1770) 95 ER 965 Heydon v NRMA Limited & Ors (2000) 51 NSWLR 1 Houghton v Immer (No. 155) Pty Ltd (1997) 44 NSWLR 46 Lin & Anor v The Owners - Strata Plan No 50276 (2004) 11 BPR 21,463 Lubrano v Proprietors of Strata Plan No 4038 (1993) 6 BPR 13,308 Luke v Luke (1936) 36 SR NSW 310 Moisley v Mahony [1950] VLR 318 Northwind Pty Ltd v The Proprietors - Strata Plan No. 3143 (1981) 2 NSWLR 809 Owners - Strata Plan 43551 v Walter Construction Group Ltd (2004) 62 NSWLR 169 R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100 R v Dunphy & Australian Industrial Court; ex parte Maynes (1978) 139 CLR 482 R v Connell; ex parte The Hetton Bellbird Collieries Limited (No. 2) (1944) 69 CLR 407 Ridis v Proprietors of Strata Plan 10308 (2005) 63 NSWLR 449 Seiwa Pty Ltd v Owners Strata Plan 35042 [2006] NSWSC 1157 Stolfa v Hempton (2010) 15 BRP 28,253 Stolfa v The Owners of Strata Plan 4366 [2009] NSWSC 589 The Proprietors of Strata Plan No 159 v Blake [1986] NSW Titles Cases 50,650 The Proprietors of Strata Plan No. 6522 v Furney & Anor (1976) 1 NSWLR 412 The Proprietors of Strata Plan (No. 30234) v Margiz Pty Ltd (1993) 32 NSWLR 294 The Proprietors of Strata Plan No 464 v Oborn (1975) 1 BPR 9,623 Vatcher v Paull [1915] AC 372 Young v Owners of Strata Plan (No 3529)(2001) 54 NSWLR 60 Texts Cited: Sugden,Sir Edward Burtenshaw; A Practical Treatise of Powers, 5th Edition, 1831, at 415 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff- Chee Min Thoo Defendant- The Owners Strata Plan No. 50276 Representation: Counsel: Plainitff- A.J.McInerney, B. Koch Defendant- V.F.Kerr Solicitors: Plaintiff- P.Sarvaas, Sarvaas Ciappara Lawyers Defendant- R.Cheung, Rutland's Law Firm File Number(s): 08/277829
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate