NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Summit Acceptance Pty Ltd v Wild [2011] NSWSC 659 Decision date: 18 May 2011 Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras [34], [35] and [36] of judgment. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - caveat - application to lodge a fresh caveat under s 74O of the Real Property Act 1900 - where plaintiff claims an interest as chargee under lease agreement and guarantee - where plaintiff obtained judgment in Local Court for amount owing by the defendant under the guarantee and for costs of the application - serious question to be tried that the charge exists and secures the obligations of the defendant under Local Court judgment - balance of convenience favours maintenance of caveat as plaintiff may be put in position of unsecured creditor if left to remedies as judgment creditor - where plaintiff does not claim for final relief in application for maintenance of caveat - plaintiff entitled to leave under s 74O if proffers an undertaking to the court to amend summons to seek final relief, at least in form of a declaration that plaintiff entitled to charge over defendant's property Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Conveyancing Act 1919 Cases Cited: Iaconis v Lazar [2007] NSWSC 1103 Wu v Dardaneliotou [2008] NSWSC 1319 Waco Kwikform Limited v Jabbour [2010] NSWSC 1379 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Summit Acceptance Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Brett Allan Wild (1st Defendant) Charmain Linden Smith (2nd Defendant) Representation: D K G Milne (Solicitor for Plaintiff) In Person (1st Defendant) David Milne & Associates (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2011/130512
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate