NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: D B Mahaffy & Associates Pty Ltd v Mahaffy [2011] NSWSC 673 Decision date: 29 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras [24], [31], [35], and [36] of judgment Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - statutory demand - application to set aside statutory demand - where plaintiff appeared through a solicitor and sought adjournment - adjournment refused - where a solicitor for plaintiff had no instructions to appear in the proceedings - where no satisfactory explanation for no appearance for plaintiff - originating process dismissed with costs
CORPORATIONS - practice and procedure - notice of motion - where director seeks leave to be joined personally as party to proceedings to set aside statutory demand - director not a proper plaintiff to set aside statutory demand
CORPORATIONS - practice and procedure - where director appeared personally for company - company required to appear by a solicitor or can appear by director if director himself a plaintiff - director not entitled as of right to appear on behalf of plaintiff - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 7.1(2) and (3)
COURTS AND JUDGES - bias - disqualification - apprehended bias - where after hearing complaint made of bias - where judge has decided previous applications adversely to complainant or his interests - where no objection taken to judge hearing application at time - where plaintiff's claim dismissed for non-appearance - remaining issue concerning costs - judge refuses to disqualify himself from dealing with remaining issue Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: JSBG Developments Pty Ltd v Kozlowski [2009] NSWSC 1128; (2009) 75 NSWLR 745 DB Mahaffy & Associates Pty Ltd v Mahaffy [2010] NSWSC 881 Mahaffy v Mahaffy [2010] NSWSC 1358 Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7; (2003) 195 ALR 225 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: D B Mahaffy & Associates Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Jeffrey Mahaffy (Defendant) Representation: R Watson (Solicitor for Plaintiff) In person (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/429076 2011/108012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate