NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Amaca Pty Ltd v Neil Aartsen [2011] NSWSC 676 Hearing dates: 13 April 2011 Decision date: 06 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: 1. Pursuant to s 5(2) of the Jurisdiction of Court (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987, the plaintiff's application to transfer proceedings No 170 of 2010 in the Dust Diseases Tribunal of NSW to the Supreme Court of South Australia is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - jurisdiction - transfer of proceedings - application to transfer proceedings pending in the Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales to the Supreme Court of South Australia - application dismissed Legislation Cited: Dust Diseases Act 2005 (SA) Dust Diseases Act Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW) Dust Diseases Tribunal (Standard Presumptions - Apportionment) Order 2007 Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007 Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Limitation of Actions Act 1936 (SA) Cases Cited: Amaca Pty Limited v Delice Matthews NSWSC, 11 February 2011 Garling J Amaca Pty Ltd v Harris [2005] NSWSC 622; B I (Contracting) Pty Limited v Haylock [2005] NSWSC 592; Bankinvest AG v Seabrook (1988) 14 NSWLR 711 BHP v Schultz (2004) 79 ALJR 348; Cameron v James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited (O'Meally J, 11 September 1995, unreported). Hayward v Barratt [2000] NSWSC 708; James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry [2000] NSWCA 353 Power Technologies Pty Ltd v Energy Australia [2010] NSWCA 107 Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Limited [1987] 1 AC 46 Stavar v Caltex Refineries (NSW) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWDDT 22; Valceski v Valceski (2007) 70 NSWLR 36 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Amaca Pty Ltd (ACN 000 035 512) (Under NSW Administered Winding up) -Plaintiff Neil Aartsen - Defendant Representation: J Sheller - Plaintiff J A McIntyre SC with S Tzouganatous - Defendant DLA Phillips Fox – Plaintiff' Slater & Gordon - Defendant File Number(s): 2010/358320
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate