NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Michael Senno v Natasha Bailey [2011] NSWSC 679 Hearing dates: Wednesday 22 June 2011 Decision date: 15 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Macready AsJ Decision: Leave to apply for orders for a property settlement pursuant to part 3 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984. Costs of the motion are to be the parties' costs in the cause, subject to an application for a different costs order made within seven days of today's date. Catchwords: Adjustment of property interests pursuant to section 20 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1984 - application for extension of time - leave sought to commence substantive proceedings - whether an occupation fee should be taken in to consideration - defendant won the domestic home in a competition Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 Defacto Relationships Act 1984 Family Law Act 1975 Lotteries and Art Unions Act 1901 Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Cases Cited: Beavan v Fallshaw (1992) 15 Fam L R 686 Booth v Ward [2007] VSC 364 Bilous v Mudaliar [2006] NSWCA 38 De Gallo v Fredrikson (2000) 27 Fam LR 162 Forgeard v Shanahan (1994) 35 NSWLR 206 Hartley Poynton Ltd v Ali (2005) 11 VR 568 Hedley v Hedley (2009) FLC 93-413 Luke v Luke (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 310 McKay v McKay [2008] NSWSC 177 Michaelopouos v Pomering [2004] NSWSC 939 Ryan v Dries [2002] NSWCA 3 Selmore v Bull [2005] NSWCA 365 Waring v Ellis (2005) 13 BPR 24,459 White v O'Neil [2010] NSWSC 1193 Whitford, In the marriage of (1979) FLC 90-612 Wright v Gibbons (1949) 78 CLR 313 Zwernemann v Conaty (Bergin J, NSW Supreme Court, 13 April 1999, unreported) Zyk, In the marriage of (1995) FLC 92-644 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff/applicant - Michael Senno Defendant/respondent - Natasha Bailey Representation: Counsel Mr Morris (for the plaintiff/applicant) Mr A Hourigan (for the defendant/respondent) Solicitors Kazi Portolesi Lawyers (for the plaintiff/applicant) Farshad Amirbeaggi, of Yates Beaggi Lawyers (for the defendant/respondent) File Number(s): 2011/107896
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate