NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: O'Hagan v Sakker [2011] NSWDC 60 Hearing dates: 24 February, 15 April, 13 & 27 May 2011 Decision date: 11 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Levy SC DCJ Decision: 1.Pursuant to s 60G of the Limitation Act 1969, the time for filing of the plaintiff's proceedings against the defendant is extended to 29 September 2010; 2.Defendant's motion filed on 7 February 2011 seeking to strike out and dismiss the plaintiff's proceedings is dismissed; 3.The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion seeking an extension of time in which to file proceedings; 4.The defendant is to pay the costs of the plaintiff in resisting the defendant's motion filed on 7 February 2011; 5.The exhibits may be returned; 6.Liberty to apply on 7 days notice if further orders are required. Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - alleged negligence in the course of abdominal surgery performed by defendant - retained surgical pack detected in plaintiff's abdominal cavity 15 years later - relevant facts and connection to surgery by defendant ascertained by plaintiff after expiry of limitation period - whether plaintiff is entitled to a grant of leave to proceed against the defendant notwithstanding expiry of limitation period - whether plaintiff's proceedings should be dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002, s 5O Limitation Act 1969, s 60G, s 60I, s 60L Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 13.4, r 14.28 Cases Cited: Adelaide Stevedoring Co Ltd v Forst [1940] HCA 45; (1940) 64 CLR 538 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor [1996] HCA 25; (1996) 186 CLR 541 CRA v Martignago (1996) 39 NSWLR 13 Commonwealth of Australia v McLean (1997) 41 NSWLR 389 Commonwealth of Australia v Nelson [2001] NSWCA 443 Commonwealth of Australia v Smith [2005] NSWCA 478 per Giles JA at [102] Dobler v Halverson and Ors [2007] NSWCA 335; (2007) 70 NSWLR 151 Drayton Coal Pty Ltd v Drain [1995] NSWCA 131 Elliott v Bickerstaff [1999] NSWCA 453 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) [1964] HCA 69; (1964) 112 CLR 125 Gretton v The Commonwealth [2005] NSWSC 437 Holt v Wynter [2000] NSWCA 143; (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Ingram v Fitzgerald (1936) NZLR 905 Mason v Demasi [2009] NSWCA 227 Strinic v Singh [2009] NSWCA 15 Van Wyk v Lewis (1924) App D (S Af) 438 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Helen Caroline Anne O'Hagan (Plaintiff) Samuel Sakker (Defendant) Representation: Mr P Mansfield (Plaintiff) Mr EC Muston (Defendant) Shaw McDonald (Plaintiff) Avant Law Pty Ltd (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/321304
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate