NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lederer v Woollahra Municipal Council [2011] NSWLEC 1190 Hearing dates: 30 June and 1 July 2011 Decision date: 11 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The application under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to amend the development consent (95/2009) for the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling at 108 Wolseley Road, Point Piper, is refused. 3. The exhibits, except Exhibits C and D, may be returned. Catchwords: APPEAL - application to modify the development consent for a dwelling to provide two single garages at the street front and consequential internal changes. Impact on streetscape, landscaping and view corridors. Desired future character. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cases Cited: Pafburn v North Sydney Council [2005] NSWLEC 444 Super Studio v Waverley [2004] NSWLEC 91 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul and Eva Lederer (Applicant)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr J Ayling, SC (Applicant)
Mr N Howie, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors Landerer & Co (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 10314 of 2011
Judgment 1This is an appeal against the refusal by Woollahra Municipal Council (the council) of an application under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) to amend the development consent (95/2009) for the demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling at 108 Wolseley Road, Point Piper (the site).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate