NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Pastizzi Cafe Pty Ltd v Hossain [2011] NSWSC 765 Hearing dates: 20 July 2011 Decision date: 20 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Gzell J Decision: Use of expert evidence refused. Catchwords: EVIDENCE - Expert Evidence - no application under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 31 r 31.19 and Practice Note SC Eq 5 [13]-[15] - non-compliance Sch 7, cl 5(1) - no acknowledgment of reading Expert Witness Code of Conduct or bound in terms of r 31.23(4) - non-compliance r 31.27(1)(e) and r 31.27(1)(f) - no indication of how expert moves from statement of facts to opinions expressed - opinion as to insolvency based on ATO debt when evidence of agreement to pay $100 a week until dispute resolved - rival business takings suggestive of ability to pay debts as and when due Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Practice Note SC Eq 5 Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich [2005] NSWSC 149; (2005) 190 FLR 242 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Pastizzi Cafe Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Deborah Ross (Second Plaintiff) Len Ross (Third Plaintiff) Miraj Hossain (First Defendant) Talukder Enterprises (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel A McInerney/M Bennett (Plaintiffs) J R Young (Defendants) Solicitors Michael Fitzgerald (Plaintiffs) Mooney & Kennedy Solicitors (Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/153417
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate