NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Hinton v David Tanti [2011] NSWIRComm 97 Hearing dates: 3 June 2011 Decision date: 07 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Kavanagh J Decision: (1) In Matter No IRC1159 of 2010, I find the defendant guilty of the offence as charged. (2) The defendant is fined in the sum of $15,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor. (3)The defendant to pay the costs of the prosecutor. There has been no agreement between the parties as to the quantification of the costs. I will hear the parties on this issue in the event no agreement can be reached. Leave to re-list at short notice. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY - breach of s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 by defendant - demolition of building - no scaffold or a hoarding erected - no bracing on wall - fall of brick wall 32 metres long into public thoroughfare - known safety features not in place - blatant breach of known Australian Standards - failure to properly risk assess - foreseeability a factor - gravity of the potential risk - general and specific deterrence - remorse shown and contrition expressed - some consideration of financial circumstance - penalty Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 3A, 21A, 22, 23, 34 Fines Act 1996 s 6 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) ss 8(2), 26(1) Cases Cited: Cahill v State of NSW (Department of Community Services (No 4) [2008] NSWIRComm 201 Capral Aluminium Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610 Inspector Morgenthal v Houghton [2010] NSWIRComm 192 Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ch'ng) (1999) 90 IR 464 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 215 ALR 213; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Morrison v Powercoal Pty Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 416; (2003) 130 IR 364 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at 281 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; 115 ACrimR 104 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Tyler v Sydney Electricity (1993) 47 IR 1 Weininger v The Queen [2003] HCA 14; 140 A Crim R 184; 196 ALR 451; (2003) 212 CLR 629 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ch'ng) v ACI Operations Pty Limited (unreported decision of Schmidt J dated 25 February 1994) Veen v The Queen (No.2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 WorkCover Authority (NSW) (Inspector Howard) v Baulderstone Hornibrook Pty Ltd [2009] NSWIRComm92; (2009) 186 IR 125 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Inspector Jamie Hinton (Prosecutor) David Victor Tanti (Defendant) Representation: D Chin of Counsel (Prosecutor) Crown Solicitor for NSW (Prosecutor) Self Represented (Defendant) File Number(s): IRC 1159 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate