NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Strickland v R O'Connor v R [2011] NSWCCA 166 Hearing dates: 20 July 2011 Decision date: 28 July 2011 Before: Allsop P at [1] Simpson J at [2] Buddin J at [3] Decision: Applicant Strickland 1 Grant leave to appeal. 2 Allow the appeal. 3 Quash the sentences imposed in the District Court and in substitution therefore impose the following sentences: (i) In respect of Count 2a, sentence the applicant to a term of 18 months to commence on 18 February 2010; (ii) In respect of Count 3a, sentence the applicant to a term of 18 months to commence on 18 July 2010; (iii) In respect of Count 4a, sentence the applicant to a term of 18 months to commence on 18 December 2010; (iv) In respect of Count 1, sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months to commence on 18 May 2011 and to expire on 17 August 2013 with a total term of 4 years and 3 months to expire on 17 August 2015. The applicant will be eligible for parole on 17 August 2013. Applicant O'Connor 1 Grant leave to appeal. 2 Allow the appeal. 3 Quash the sentences imposed in the District Court and in substitution therefore impose the following sentences: (i) In respect of Count 2a, sentence the applicant to a term of 12 months to commence on 8 March 2010; (ii) In respect of Count 3a, sentence the applicant to a term of 15 months to commence on 8 June 2010; (iii) In respect of Count 4a, sentence the applicant to a term of 15 months to commence on 8 September 2010; (iv) In respect of Count 1, sentence the applicant to a non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months to commence on 8 December 2010 and to expire on 7 March 2013 with a total term of 4 years and 3 months to expire on 7 March 2015. The applicant will be eligible for parole on 7 March 2013. Catchwords: Criminal law - appeal against sentence - offences of aggravated break, enter and steal and break, enter and steal - whether sentences manifestly excessive - whether error in failing to take into account that various of the offences could have been dealt with in the Local Court Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Bonwick v R [2010] NSWCCA 177 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul James Strickland Regina Corey Francis O'Connor Regina Representation: Counsel: H Cox (Applicant Strickland) P Winch (Applicant O'Connor) Solicitors: Aboriginal Legal Service (Applicant Strickland) Legal Aid Commission (Applicant O'Connor) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) File Number(s): 2009/62208 2009/45738 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-08-26 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2009/62208; 2009/45738
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate