NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: KCL Developments Pty Limited v TQM Design & Construct Pty Limited & Ors [2011] NSWSC 780 Hearing dates: 22/07/2011 Decision date: 22 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: Einstein J Decision: The application is dismissed with costs Catchwords: Application for strike out of pleadings - UCPR r14.28 - Evidence in strike out proceedings - Refusal to determine merits in application for strike out - Strictness in entertaining strike out applications in Technology and Construction List Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 937 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 Fidelitas Shipping Co Ltd v V/O Exportchleb [1966] 1 QB 630 GR Securities Pty Ltd v Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd (1986) 40 NSWLR 631 Harris v Caladine, In the Marriage of (1991) 172 CLR 84 Kell & Rigby Holdings Pty Ltd v Lindsay Bennelong Developments Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 777 McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579 Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 456 Polyukhovich v Commonwealth of Australia (War Crimes Case) (1991) 172 CLR 501 Nolan, Re; Ex parte Young (1991) 172 CLR 460 R v Trade Practices Tribunal; Ex parte Tasmanian Breweries Pty Ltd (1970) 123 CLR 361 Remmington v Scoles [1897] 2 Ch 1 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 X (Minors) v Bedfordshire County Council [1995] 2 AC 633 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: KCL Developments Pty Limited (Plaintiff) TQM Design & Construct Pty Limited (First Defendant) Mark Taouk (Second Defendant) Maroun Taouk (Third Defendant) Lyall Dix (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr F Hicks (Plaintiff) Ms V Culkoff (First and Third Defendants) Solicitors: Newhouse and Arnold Solicitors (Plaintiff) Orsini Solicitors (First and Third Defendants) File Number(s): 2010/345384
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate