NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Malcolm Potier [2011] NSWCCA 170 Hearing dates: Wednesday 4 May 2011 Decision date: 28 July 2011 Before: Whealy JA McCallum J Schmidt J Decision: Applications dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - applicant seeking to rely upon fresh evidence relating to earlier convictions relevant to conviction appealed from - application to cross-examine juror from earlier trial as to impact evidence would have had upon the jury's deliberations at that trial - application to cross-examine a police witness as to compliance with order to produce Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Jury Act 1977 Cases Cited: Burrell v R [2008] HCA 34; 238 CLR 218 Gallagher v The Queen [1986] HCA 26; 160 CLR 392 Mickelberg & The Queen [1989] HCA 35; 167 CLR 259 R v Potier [2004] NSWCCA 136 R v Potier [2005] NSWCCA 336 Potier v R [2006] NSWCCA 27 Potier v R [2010] NSWCCA 231 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Malcolm Potier (appellant) Crown (respondent) Commissioner of Police (respondent to order to produce) Representation: Counsel M Potier (self represented) N Norman (for Crown) M England (for Commissioner of Police) Solicitors M Potier (self represented) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) - Sydney (for Crown) Crown Solicitor's Office - Sydney (for Commissioner of Police) File Number(s): 2005/14700 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate