NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Davies v Richardson [2011] NSWSC 810 Hearing dates: 10 & 11 March 2011 Decision date: 18 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Slattery J Decision: Relationship between the plaintiff and defendant ended before 1 March 2009. The Property (Relationships) Act 1982 applies to the adjustment of the parties' interests in their joint property - the Supreme Court of New South Wales, not the Family Court of Australia has jurisdiction in respect of the adjustment of the parties' interests in their joint property - consequent upon the breakdown of their relationship. Catchwords: FAMILY LAW - Domestic relationships other than marriage - application of Property (Relationships) Act 1982 - whether de facto relationship ended before or after the commencement of the Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008 on 1 March 2009 - whether relationship had "broken down" before or after 1 March 2009 - test to be applied. Legislation Cited: De Facto Relationships Act (1984) (NSW) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters and Other Measures) Act 2008 (Cth) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) Cases Cited: Gazzard v Winders (1998) 23 Fam LR 716 Hibberson v George (1989) 12 Fam LR 725 Lipman v Lipman (1989) DFC 95-068 Pavey v Pavey [1976] FLC 90-051 S v B (No. 2) [2005] 1 Qd R 537 Thomson v Badger (1990) DFC 95-078 Vine v Carey [2009] FMCA Fam 1017 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff- Steve Davies Defendant- Rebecca Richardson Representation: Plaintiff- R. Schonell SC Defendant- G. Johnston Plaintiff- Rebekah Dorter, Reid Family Lawyers Defendant- Yves Hazan, Hazan Hollander File Number(s): 224336/10 Publication restriction: No.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate