NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Application of Robert Minniti [2011] NSWSC 835 Hearing dates: On written submissions Decision date: 20 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Latham J Decision: The application under s 79(1)(b) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 is refused. Catchwords: Criminal law - application for enquiry after conviction - application under s 79 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - claim of doubt or question as to applicant's guilt - no substantial failure of trial judge to perform duty in reality or appearance - judge's conduct did not affect outcome of trial or create a risk that trial would be affected Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Robert Minniti v R [2006] NSWCCA 30 Varley v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318 Cesan v The Queen ; Mas Rivadavia v The Queen [2008] HCA 52 Cesan v Director of Public Prosecutions; Mas Rivadavia v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCCA 273 TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR124 Nudd v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 614 Application of Pedrana [2000] NSWSC 970 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Minniti (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Gregory J Goold (Applicant - submissions prior to 14 January 2010) Criminal Justice Division, Attorney-General's Department (Respondent - submissions prior to 3 June 2010) File Number(s): 10/10204
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate