NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 135 Hearing dates: 27 May 2011, 1 July 2011, 1 August 2011 Decision date: 09 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Craig J Decision: 1. The applicant's Amended Notice of Motion dated 1 July 2011 is dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. 3. Case management of the proceedings is stood over to a date to be agreed among the parties or otherwise determined by the Court and to be fixed immediately following delivery of this judgment. 4. Exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - notice of motion for discovery as well as declaratory and prohibitory relief - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR) 21.1 and 21.2 - documents relevant to facts asserted to support declaratory and prohibitory orders sought in notice of motion - documents not relevant to facts in issue in the substantive proceedings - orders sought by motion do not advance claims made in the substantive proceedings - UCPR 18.1 - inappropriate for declaratory orders or final prohibitory orders - necessity for orders sought to engage the jurisdiction of the Court - making of orders not consistent with Div 1 of Pt 6 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 - motion dismissed. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Local Government Act 1993 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 21.1, 21.2 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council (No 2) [2010] NSWCA 367 Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 28 Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council (No 9) [2011] NSWLEC 123 Johnston v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd; Johnston v Richardson [2003] NSWSC 454 Logue v Shoalhaven Shire Council [1979] 1 NSWLR 537 Mulley & Marney v Manifold [1959] HCA 23; (1959) 103 CLR 341 Re Jay-O-Bees; Rosseau Pty Ltd (in liq) v Jay-O-Bees Pty Ltd (in liq) [2004] NSWSC 818; (2004) 50 ACSR 565 Scott v Handley [1999] FCA 404 Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Ivan Jeray (Applicant) Blue Mountains City Council (First Respondent) Mr John Egan (Second Respondent) Mr Greg Egan (Third Respondent) Representation: Applicant in person Mr I J Hemmings (First Respondent) Mr P Clay (Second and Third Respondents) Self-represented (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (First Respondent) Crennan Legal Pty Ltd (Second and Third Respondents) File Number(s): 40986 of 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate