NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Henderikus Zandstra v Peter Samuel Smith [2011] NSWSC 855 Hearing dates: 17/06/2011 Decision date: 17 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Cross-claimants permitted to adduce evidence from expert witness at hearing. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Expert evidence - cross-claimant seeks direction to adduce expert evidence at trial - cross-defendant contends expert evidence is suboptimal - not impossible that evidence will be of use at trial - no evidence that evidence caught cross-defendant by surprise - obligation of cross-defendant as much as cross-claimant to seek direction - report served almost concurrently with joinder of cross-defendants - no evidence of prejudice - direction made. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 31.19 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Henderikus Zandstra (plaintiff/first cross-defendant) Peter Samuel Smith (first defendant/cross-claimant) Wayne Smith (second defendant/cross-claimant) John Smith (third defendant/cross-claimant) Street Quinn P/L (second cross-defendant) Phillip Abner Balding (third cross-defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr Rickard (plaintiff/first cross-defendant) Mr Sleight (defendants/cross-claimants) Mr Maroya (second & third cross-defendants) Solicitors: Lees Lawyers (plaintiff/first cross-defendant) Neville & Hourn Legal (defendants/cross-claimants) Colin Biggers & Paisley (second & third cross-defendant) File Number(s): 2008/282311
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate