NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Martin v R [2011] NSWCCA 188 Hearing dates: 3/08/2011 Decision date: 22 August 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Simpson J at [2] Fullerton J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - break and enter and commit serious indictable offence - whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of objective seriousness of offence - whether sentencing judge erred in failure to provide reasons for departure from standard non-parole period - whether sentencing judge erred in finding offence was aggravated Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Hiron v R [2007] NSWCCA 336 Ngati v R [2008] NSWCCA 3; 180 A Crim R 384 R v McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242; 163 A Crim R 381 Shaw v R [2008] NSWCCA 58 Terkmani v R [2009] NSWCCA 142; 195 A Crim R 298 Zammit v R [2010] NSWCCA 29 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Paul Martin (Applicant) The Crown Representation: Counsel T Gartelmann (Applicant) S Dowling (Crown) Solicitors Legal Aid Commission of NSW (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/5326; 2009/46343 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-04-22 00:00:00 Before: Tupman DCJ File Number(s): 2009/5326; 2009/46343
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate