NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Geftlic v Merhi & Ors [2011] NSWCA 241 Hearing dates: 6 July 2011 Decision date: 25 August 2011 Before: Giles JA at [1], Young JA at [22], Handley AJA at [27] Decision: Application dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - application for certiorari - respondent brought proceedings in Local Court - assessor gave judgment in favour of respondent - applicant appealed to District Court on grounds of jurisdictional error and denial of procedural fairness - appeal dismissed - no relief in relation to Local Court proceedings when relying on same grounds as those in unsuccessful appeal to District Court - (per Giles JA) relief refused as matter of discretion - (per Handley AJA, Young JA agreeing) decision of District Court created binding issue estoppels - no relief in relation to District Court proceedings - (per curiam) no jurisdictional error or error of law on the face of the record. Cases Cited: Craig v The State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163; Hockey v Yelland [1984] HCA 72, (1984) 157 CLR 124; Jackson v Goldsmith [1950] HCA 22, 81 CLR 446; Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; (2010) 239 CLR 1; Marginson v Blackburn BC [1939] 2 KB 426 CA, 438; Meagher v Stevenson (1993) 40 NSWLR 736; Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2009] NSWCA 434; (2008) 263 ALR 556; Ramsey v Pigram [1968] HCA 34; (1968)118 CLR 271; Watt (formerly Carter) v Ahsan [2007] UKHL 51, [2008] 1 AC 696; Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470. Texts Cited: Wade & Forsyth, Administrative Law, 9th ed (Oxford University Press, 2004) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Layla Hassan Geftlic - Applicant Mariam Merhi - First Respondent Local Court of New South Wales - Second Respondent District Court of New South Wales - Third Respondent Representation: Applicant in person (assisted by J M Patel) U Coustas (Solicitor) - First Respondent Submitting appearances - Second and Third Respondents Applicant in person Lexington Law Group Pty Ltd - First Respondent I V Knight, Crown Solicitor - Second and Third Respondents File Number(s): CA 2010/337205 Decision under appeal Citation: Geftlic v Merhi (Garling DCJ, 14 August 2009, unreported) Date of Decision: 2009-08-14 00:00:00 Before: Garling DCJ File Number(s): 1175/09
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate