NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Eddie Michael Awad & anor v Twin Creek Properties Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 922 Hearing dates: 27/06/2011 Decision date: 27 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Refuse to admit notices of valuation Catchwords: EVIDENCE - documents contain statement of land value by Valuer-General - (NSW) Evidence Act s 156 does not provide for admissibility of public documents - whether documents business records - business includes activity engaged in or carried on by the Crown in any of its capacities - document a business record falling within business records exception to the hearsay rule - whether if hearsay rule does not apply document containing opinions may be excluded by opinion rule - prevailing view that opinion rule applies to business records - document containing opinions based on specialised knowledge, training, study or experience admissible - general discretion to exclude evidence - Makita principles do not apply to render business records containing opinions inadmissible -circumstances include Valuer-General not available for cross-examination, plaintiffs to call other valuation evidence, defendant serves no valuation evidence, notice of valuation does not reveal rationale - evidence unfairly prejudicial to defendant and discretion exercised to exclude. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Evidence Act 1995, s 69, s 76, s 79, s 156, Dictionary Pt 2. (NSW) Valuation of Land Act 1916, s 14CC Cases Cited: Enviro Energy Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2010] NSWSC 1217 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705. Re Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich, (2005) 216 ALR 320 Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Ltd [2003] FCA 933 Tyneside Property Management Pty Ltd v Hammersmith Management Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 395 Young v Coupe [2004] NSWSC 546 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Eddie Michael Awad (first plaintiff) Karen Elizabeth Awad (second plaintiff) Twin Creeks Properties Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: CJ Birch SC and DS Wienberger (plaintiffs) J Robson SC and D Healey (defendants) Solicitors: Thurlow Fisher Solicitors (plaintiff) Surry Partners Lawyers Pty Ltd (defendant) File Number(s): 2009/00291401
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate