NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: James Bryden as Executor of the estate of John Anthony (deceased) v Minister for Lands & Ors [2011] NSWSC 945 Hearing dates: 16, 17, 18 and 23 August 2011 Decision date: 02 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: Minister's decision invalidated. See paragraph [72] Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - procedural fairness - whether entitled to - legitimate expectation - representations or assurance by Minister - content of hearing rule - notice and right to make submissions - practical injustice ROADS ACT - operation of Part 8 - existence of statutory precondition for exercise of discretion under Section 115 - entitlement to notice under Roads Regulation 2008 - meaning of "closure" for purposes of Roads Regulation 2008 - CROWN LANDS ACT - entitlement to object to minister's direction under section 70 - whether statutory precondition barring objection fulfilled - construction of recommendations of local land board - power of minister to direct removal of gates - power of minister to cancel enclosure permit Legislation Cited: Crown Lands Act, 1989 (NSW) Road Act, 1993 (NSW) Cases Cited: Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596 Commissioner of Police v Ryan (2007) 70 NSWLR 73 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1985-86) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam [2003] 214 CLR 1 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Bryden as executor of the Estate of John Anthony - plaintiff Minister for Lands - first defendant Scott Hunter - second defendant Helen Hunter - third defendant Representation: Counsel: Ms K Traill with Ms R Graycar - for the plaintiff Mr A S Monzo - for the first defendant A J J Thompson (solicitor) - for the second and third defendants Solicitors: Unsworth Legal - for the plaintiff Crown Lands Legal - for the first defendant Ritchie & Castellan - for the second and third defendants File Number(s): 2011/084001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate