NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Baker & anor v Paul & anor [2011] NSWSC 957 Hearing dates: 17/06/2011 Decision date: 17 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: Brereton J Decision: Grant leave to plaintiffs/cross-defendants to use affidavit of director of defendant company in security for costs proceeding. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Plaintiff seeks to use affidavit evidence filed by defendant pursuant to asset preservation order in security of costs application - whether leave required to use evidence for purpose other than for what it was given - use to be made of evidence in same proceeding relevant factor - nature of asset preservation order and connection with security for costs order also relevant factor - leave granted. Legislation Cited: (UK) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.21 Cases Cited: Bhattcharya v Freedman [2001] NSWSC 498 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 Medway v Doublelock Ltd [1978] 1 WLR 710 Rajski v Computer Manufacture and Design Pty Ltd (1982) 2 NSWLR 443 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Kenneth James Baker (first plaintiff) KJB Media Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) Anthony Christopher Paul (first defendant) ACN 129 258 546 Pty Ltd (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M W Sneddon (plaintiffs) Solicitors: McLaughlin & Riordan (plaintiffs) File Number(s): 2010/285602
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate