NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Szanto v Bainton [2011] NSWSC 985 Hearing dates: 12 August 2011 Decision date: 25 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Ward J Decision: Orders made for provision of security for costs. First Amended Statement of Claim struck out. Leave to replead limited causes of action. Balance of notice of motion filed by first and second defendants on 11 May 2011 stood over. Plaintiff to pay costs of application on 12 August 2011. Catchwords: COSTS - application pursuant to Rule 42.12 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 for security for costs - HELD - security for costs granted - CIVIL PROCEDURE - application pursuant to Rule 14.28 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 to strike out parts of Statement of Claim - HELD - Statement of Claim struck out as embarrassing (and in parts not disclosing an arguable cause of action) - leave granted to the plaintiff to replead particular causes of action subject to specific conditions being met by the plaintiff Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2005 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) Duties Act 1997 (NSW) Foreign Judgments Regulation 1992 (Cth) Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allen v Tobias (1958) 98 CLR 367 Allstate Life Insurance Co v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (1995) 134 ALR 187 Amalgamated Mining Services Pty Ltd v Warman International Ltd (1988) 19 FCR 324; 88 ALR 63 Arthur Young v Tieco International (1995) 182 LSJS 367 Australian Wool Innovation Ltd v Newkirk [2005] FCA 290 Bainton v Szanto [2011] NSWSC 278 Banque Commerciale SA (in liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279; 92 ALR 53 Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Brimson v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 937 British American Tobacco v Cowell (2002) 7 VR 524 Brocklebank & Co v The King's Lynn Steamship Co (1878) 3 CPD 365 Bruce v Odhams Press Limited [1936] 1 KB 697 Brundza v Robbie & Co (No 2) (1952) 88 CLR 171 Bryan E Fencott & Associates Pty Ltd v Eretta Pty Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 497 Buckley v Bennell Design & Construction Pty Ltd (1974) 1 ACLR 301 Byron Shire Business for the Future Inc v Byron Shire Council and Holiday Villages (Byron Bay) Pty Ltd (1994) 83 LGERA 59 Cabassi v Vila (1940) 64 CLR 130 Clark v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 673 Commonwealth v Cable Water Skiing (Aust) Ltd (1994) 14 ACSR 760 Commonwealth v Griffiths (2007) 70 NSWLR 268 Connop v Varena [1984] 1 NSWLR 71 Dae Boong International Co Pty Ltd v Gray [2009] NSWCA 11 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 Davy v Garrett (1877) 7 Ch D 473 Dey v Victorian Railway Cmrs (1949) 78 CLR 62 Dresna Pty Ltd v Misu Nominees Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 169; (2004) ATPR 42-013 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Fatimi Pty Ltd v Bryant (2004) 59 NSWLR 678 Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 664; (2004) 208 ALR 564 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125, Gibson v Parkes District Hospital and Anor (1991) 26 NSWLR 9 Gunns Ltd v Marr [2005] VSC 251 Hall-Gibbs Mercantile Agency Ltd v Dun (1910) 12 CLR 84 Harvey v Jacob (1817) 106 ER 59 Heller Factors Pty Ltd v John Arnold's Surf Shop Pty Ltd (1979) 4 ACLR 492 Hill v Hart-Davis (1884) 26 Ch D 470 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Assn Inc (1986) 69 ALR 660 Ingot Capital Investments Pty Limited v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Limited [2008] NSWCA 206; (2008) 73 NSWLR 653 Ingot Capital Investments v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets [2004] NSWSC 1136 Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd [1973] QB 233; 1 All ER 71 JWH Turner & Co Ltd v O'Riordan (1923) 40 WN (NSW) 64 KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd (1995) 56 FCR 189; 13 ALC 437 Leybourne v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2010] NSWCA 78 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in liq) (2008) 232 CLR 635 Lumley v Gye (1853) 2 El & Bl 216; 118 ER 749 Lynnebry Pty Ltd v Farquhar Enterprises Pty Ltd (1977) 3 ACLR 133 Mann v Cahill [1999] ACTSC 7; (1999) 149 FLR 298 Massey v Allen (1879) 12 ChD 807 McKernan v Fraser (1931) 46 CLR 343 Meltglow Mills v Central Sydney Area Health Service [2002] NSWSC 728 National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu [1999] NSWSC 539 Newtons Travel Services Pty Ltd v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (1982) 7 ACLR 556 Northam v Favelle Favco Holdings (unreported, NSWSC, 7 March 1995) NWR FM t/a North West Radio v Broadcasting Commission of Ireland & Anor [2004] IEHC 109 O'Keefe v Seafresh Holdings Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1090 Pinson v Lloyds and National Provincial Foreign Bank Limited [1941] 2 KB 72 Rajski v Scitec Corporation Pty Ltd (unreported, NSWCA, 16 June 1986) Ratcliffe v Evans [1892] 2 QB 524 Re Parton; Townsend v Parton (1882) 30 WR 287 Republic of Peru v Peruvian Guano Co (1887) 36 Ch D 489 Rubenstein v Truth and Sportsman Limited [1960] VR 473 Shelton v National Roads & Motorists Assn Ltd [2004] FCA 1393; (2004) 51 ACSR 278 Soden v Kowalski [2011] FCA 318 Southern Cross Exploration NL v Fire & All Risks Insurance Co Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 114 State of New South Wales v McCloy Hutcherson Pty Ltd (1993) 116 ALR 363 The Ophelia [1916] 2 AC 206 Thorp v Holdsworth (1876) 3 Ch D 637 Travel Compensation Fund v Blair [2003] NSWSC 720 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Wilkinson v Downton [1897] 2 QB 57 Williams v Hursey (1959) 103 CLR 30 Worthington & Co Ltd v Belton (1902) 18 TLR 438 Texts Cited: Balkin & Davis, Law of Torts (4th edn) Encyclopaedic Australian Legal Dictionary Heydon, Economic Torts Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure The Laws of Australia (2nd edn) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Peter Szanto (Plaintiff) Mark Jason Bainton (First Defendant) Claire Louise Bainton (Second Defendant) Troy Douglas (Third Defendant) Nicholas Schmidt aka Nick Levy-Schmidt (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel J Emmett (First & Second Defendants) Solicitors Peter Szanto (Plaintiff) (self represented) Chapman & Chapman (First & Second Defendants) No appearance for Third & Fourth Defendants File Number(s): 10/414171
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate