NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abdel-Hady ("SA") v R [2011] NSWCCA 196 Hearing dates: 8 August 2011 Decision date: 28 October 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [2] Fullerton J at [2] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Convictions quashed. 3. New trial ordered in respect of each count. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - causing another to take a stupefying drug with attempt to commit an indictable offence - indecent assault - whether trial judge's summing up was unbalanced - whether trial judge erred in failing to direct jury to consider each count on indictment separately - whether trial judge erred in failing to give Markuleski direction Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: R v Inamata [2003] NSWCCA 19; 137 A Crim R 510 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290; 52 NSWLR 82 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 RPS v R [2000] HCA 3; 199 CLR 620 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Safwat Abdel-Hady (Appellant) The Crown Representation: P Hamill SC / G Brady (Appellant) S Dowling (Crown) Conaghan Hunter Solicitors (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2008/6943 Publication restriction: Complainants to be referred to by pseudonyms AW and MD Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-02-19 00:00:00 Before: King DCJ File Number(s): 2008/6943
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate