NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clemson v Barber; Starkey v Barber [2011] NSWSC 995 Hearing dates: 15 August 2011 Decision date: 16 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Associate Justice Macready Decision: The orders that I make are as follows: 1 That in lieu of the provisions of the will of the deceased for a life estate in favour of the plaintiff Pamela Clemson, she receives the deceased's real estate absolutely; 2 I dismiss proceedings 2010/273928; 3 In proceedings 2010/42751, I order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis, and charge the deceased's property with the payment of those costs. Catchwords: WILLS AND ESTATES - family provision claim - financial resources and needs of claimant - only possible to provide for one claimant - claimant daughters needs were great however estate it was not possible to make provision for claimant - widow's claim prevailed over daughter's claim Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Cases Cited: Banks v Hourigan (NSWSC, Waddell CJ in Eq, 2 March 1989, unreported) Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 Cameron v Hills (NSWSC, Needham J, 26 October 1989, unreported). Crisp v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd (NSWSC, Holland J, 18 December 1979, unreported) Court v Hunt (NSWSC, 14 September 1987, unreported) Elliott v Elliott (NSWCA, 24 April 1986, unreported) Golosky v Golosky (NSWCA, 5 October 1993, unreported) Hertzberg v Hertzberg [2003] NSWCA 311 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 Marshall v Carruthers [2002] NSWCA 47 Permanent Trustee v Fraser (1995) 36 NSWLR 24 Salmon v Blackford [1997] NSWCA 274 Singer v Berghouse [1994] HCA 40 White v Barron (1980) 144 CLR 431) Worladge v Doddridge (1957) 97 CLR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Pamela Clemson (Plaintiff) Kaye Leslie Starkey (Plaintiff) Elizabeth Barber and Robert Williams (Defendant) Representation: Counsel J Ryan (for Clemson) PR Glissan (for Starkey) DM Flaherty (Defendant) Solicitors Mark Brown & Associates (for Clemson) Roderick Storie Solicitors (for Starkey) John De Mattia & Company (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/042751; 2010/273928
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate