NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barescape Pty Ltd atf The Vs Family Trust & Ors v Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd atf The Bacchus Holdings Trust & Anor [2011] NSWSC 1002 Hearing dates: 9 to 12 August and 15 to 18 August 2011 Decision date: 11 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Black J Decision: Joint expert's report excluded under Evidence Act s 135 Catchwords: EXPERTS' REPORTS - whether UCPR r 31.26 requires admission of joint experts report - failure of expert report to disclose reasoning process - Exclusion of joint report under Evidence Act s 135 Legislation Cited: - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) - s 56 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 31.26 - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - s 79, s 135 Cases Cited: Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Barescape Pty Ltd atf The Vs Family Trust (First Plaintiff/First Cross Defendant) Anthony Ventura (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross Defendant) Midfielder Pty Ltd (Third Cross Defendant) Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd atf The Bacchus Holdings Trust (First Defendant/Cross Claimant) Matthew Gordon Higgins (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R.J. Burbidge QC, C.D. Wood (Plaintiffs/ Cross Defendants) J.C. Kelly SC, A.A. Henskens, N.E. Furlan (Defendants/Cross Claimant) Solicitors: Hicksons (Plaintiffs/ Cross Defendants) Bilbie Dan (Defendants/Cross Claimant) File Number(s): 09/291437
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate