NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Prior v Brown [2011] NSWSC 1006 Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8 June 2011; 30 and 31 August 2011 Decision date: 14 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Hallen AsJ Decision: Stand the proceedings over to a mutually convenient time for the making of orders. Catchwords: Application brought by Plaintiff against former de facto partner under Property (Relationships) Act - Parties do not agree when the relationship commenced or when it ended - Principal issue of property adjustment dependant upon other findings including duration of the relationship, nature and value of property owned - Time at which value of the property is to be calculated - Direct and indirect contributions made by each party Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Evidence Act 1995 Fair Trading Act 1987 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Family Law Amendment (De Facto Financial Matters & Other Measures) Act 2008 (Cth) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Trade Practices Act 1974 Cases Cited: Beattie v Reid [2002] NSWSC 1088; (2002) 31 FamLR 204 Beltran v Hudspith [2011] NSWCA 178 Bilous v Mudaliar [2006] NSWCA 38; (2006) 65 NSWLR 615 Black v Black (1991) 15 Fam LR 109 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Burgess v King [2005] NSWSC 231 Burgess v King [2005] NSWCA 396; (2005) 64 NSWLR 293 Burgess v Moss (2010) 43 Fam LR 260; [2010] DFC 95-423; [2010] NSWCA 139 Chanter v Catts [2005] NSWCA 411; (2005) 64 NSWLR 360 Clisbey v Viges [2011] FAMCA 611 Davies v Dabela [2011] NSWSC 12 Dion v Rieser [2010] NSWSC 50 Ducker v Smith [2011] NSWCA 212 Dwyer v Kaljo (1987) 11 Fam LR 785 Dwyer v Kaljo (1992) 27 NSWLR 728 EB v CT [2008] QSC 303 Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSWLR 70 Fletcher v Furnance [2008] NSWSC 132 Giller v Procopets [2008] VSCA 236 Green v Robinson (1995) 36 NSWLR 96 Harbour Port Consulting v NSW Maritime [2011] NSWSC 813 Hogg v Roberts [2003] SASC 410; (2003) 87 SASR 248 Howell v Fiorenza [2008] NSWSC 163 Howlett v Neilson [2005] NSWCA 149; (2005) 33 Fam LR 402 Jensen v Ray [2011] NSWCA 247 Jonah v White [2011] FamCA 221 Kardos v Sarbutt [2006] NSWCA 11; (2006) 34 Fam LR 550 Kemp v French [2010] NSWSC 971 Kenyon v Akeroyd [2008] VSCA 277 Kozjak v Oswin [2010] NSWCA 260 LW v GAB [2007] QCA 386 Marker v Marker (1998) FamCA 42 Murgic v Murgic [2011] NSWSC 971 Paino v Paino [2008] NSWCA 276; (2008) 40 Fam LR 96 Parker v Parker (1993) 16 Fam LR 863 Powell v Supresencia [2003] NSWCA 195; (2003) 30 FamLR 463 Robb; In the Marriage of [1994] FamCA 136; (1995) FLC 92-555 Rose v Richards [2004] NSWSC 315 Ryan v Kalocsay [2010] NSWSC 620 Saric v Steward [2006] NSWCA 260 Separovich v Ferrao [2011] NSWCA 180 Smyth & Pappas [2011] FamCA 434 Sullman v Sullman [2002] NSWSC 169 Van Zonneveld v Seaton [2004] NSWSC 1223 Vitali v Stachnik [2001] NSWSC 408; (2001) 28 Fam LR 142 Wallace v Stanford (1995) 37 NSWLR 1 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 WB v GSH [2008] QSC 346 Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon (2003) 200 ALR 447; [2003] HCA 48 Williams & Williams [2007] FamCA 313 Texts Cited: J Spigelman CJ, "Truth and the Law", Lecture delivered at the 2011 Sir Maurice Byers Lecture, 26 May 2011 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Helen Teresa Prior (Plaintiff) Leonard Graham Brown (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms J McIntosh (Plaintiff) Mr J Millar (Defendant) Solicitors: Grech Partners (Plaintiff) Swaab Attorneys (Defendant) File Number(s): 2007/257117
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate