NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SEVASTOPOULOS v REGINA [2011] NSWCCA 201 Hearing dates: Friday 13 May 2011 Decision date: 06 September 2011 Before: Tobias AJA at [1] Johnson J at [2] Hall J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) The appeal, in part, be upheld. (3) That the applicant be re-sentenced to a non-parole period of 8 years and 6 months commencing on 9 May 2005 and expiring on 8 November 2013 with an additional 4 years expiring on 8 November 2017. (4) Accordingly, the earliest date upon which the applicant will be eligible for release on parole will be 8 November 2013. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - supply of large commercial quantity of prohibited drugs - whether applicant's role as "broker", with no managerial function, entitled him to a finding of below the mid-range of objective seriousness - applicant received only minimal payment for his "services" - whether applicant had a legitimate grievance arising from disparity of sentences of co-accused - whether parity principle with respect to non-parole period infringed - finding of special circumstances made - proportion of non-parole period to head sentence in error - appeal allowed in part Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Cicciarello v R [2009] NSWCCA Lau v R [2010] NSWCCA 43 OM v R; MH v R; AA v R; AS v R [2009] NSWCCA 267 at [27] R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 R v Pavan [2009] NSWDC 82 R v Sinkovich [2011] NSWCCA 90 R v Sutton [2004] NSWCCA 225 R v Wahabzadah [2001] NSWCCA 253 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers (2007) 173 A Crim R 458 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen SEVASTOPOULOS v REGINA Representation: Crown: D Staehli SC Applicant: S Odgers SC Crown: Commonwealth DPP Applicant: S E O'Connor File Number(s): 2006/15539 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2008-03-20 00:00:00 Before: Ainslie-Wallace DCJ File Number(s): 2006/15539
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate