NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Knox v Love [2011] NSWLEC 1257 Hearing dates: 11 August 2011 Decision date: 11 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Dixon C Galwey AC Decision: (1) The respondents are to prune the hedge, which consists of eight Camellias and one Maple, to a height no greater than 3.0 m above ground level, measured from the base of each tree. (2) The orders in (1) are to be carried out within 60 days of the date of these orders. (3) The respondents are to maintain the hedge at a height no greater than 3.3 m above ground level, measured from the base of each tree. Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS]; hedge; obstruction of sunlight Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr A Knox (Applicant) Ms J Knox (Applicant)
Mr J Love (Respondent) Ms B Love (Respondent) Representation: A & J Knox (Applicants in person)
J & B Love (Respondents in person) File Number(s): 20275 of 2011
Judgment
Introduction 1The owners of a property in Pymble have applied to the Court seeking orders regarding trees on an adjoining property and associated issues. 2This tree dispute application is in two parts. Firstly, pursuant to s 7 Part 2 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act), the applicants seek the removal of the English Oak that grows on the respondents' property on the basis that it has caused damage to their property. They also seek orders allowing them to reinstate the stormwater, sewer and concrete paving in their property, and for repairs to a damaged wall of their dwelling, at the respondents' cost. Other orders sought under this part of the application include removal of soil build-up against a fence and removal of a water tank. 3Secondly, pursuant to s 14B Part 2A of the Act, the applicant seeks orders for the pruning of a hedge of mixed species growing on the respondents' property, and the ongoing maintenance of the hedge at a given height, on the basis that it obstructs sunlight to windows of their dwelling. Other orders sought under this part of the application include the removal of the English Oak mentioned above and an order preventing the respondents from undertaking any further planting along their eastern boundary.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate