NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kang v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 150 Hearing dates: 27 May 2010, 28 May 2010 Decision date: 06 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Craig J Decision: 1. Summons dismissed. 2. Applicants to pay the respondent's costs unless within seven days, a notice of motion is filed seeking to argue costs. 3. Exhibits may be returned. Catchwords: ENVIRONMENT & PLANNING - environmental planning - planning instruments - extraction of groundwater from land - whether characterised as a "home business" and permissible without consent under the Blue Mountains LEP 2005 - activity does not fall within definition - necessary for business activities to be the use of identified buildings on the land as commercial premises - limitations expressed in planning instrument directed to physical structures in which "home business" is carried out - whether orders made in earlier decision should be discharged or varied pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r. 36.17 - activities now found to be permitted by planning law Legislation Cited: Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan No. 4 Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan 2005 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 Environmental Planning Policy No. 30 - Intensive Agriculture Interpretation Act 1987, s 6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r. 36.17 Water Act 1912 Cases Cited: Ashfield Municipal Council v Armstrong [2003] NSWCA 353 Blue Mountains City Council v Waterland Blue Mountain Natural Water Pty Ltd [2007] NSWLEC 101 CB Investments Pty Ltd v Colo Shire Council (1980) 41 LGRA 270 Chamwell Pty Ltd v Strathfield Council [2007] NSWLEC 114; (2007) 151 LGERA 400 Cranbrook School v Woollahra Municipal Council [2006] NSWCA 155; (2006) 66 NSWLR 379 Dow Jones& Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; (2002) 210 CLR 575 Friends of Pryor Park Inc v Ryde Council [1995] NSWLEC 160 Habib v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 231 Henderson v Henderson [1843] 3 Hare 100; 67 ER 313 Holidays-a-Float Pty Ltd v Hornsby Council (1992) 75 LGRA 127 Liauw v Gosford City Council [2004] NSWLEC 72 Mulcahy v Blue Mountains City Council (1993) 81 LGERA 302 Multistar Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (No. 2) ; [2000] NSWLEC 242 Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd v The J Aron Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group Inc [2007] NSWCA 195; (2007) 70 NSWLR 411 Penrith City Council v Waste Management Authority (1990) 71 LGRA 376 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Rahme v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1991] NSWCA 230 Rogers v R [1994] HCA 42; (1994) 181 CLR 251 Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning (1996) 90 LGERA 1 Warlam Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2009] NSWLEC 23; (2009) 165 LGERA 184 Waterland Blue Mountain Natural Water Pty Ltd v Blue Mountains City Council [2006] NSWLEC 537 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jun Sik Kang (First Applicant) Waterland Blue Mountain Natural Water Pty Ltd (Second Applicant) Blue Mountains City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr A M Pickles (First and Second Applicants) Mr I J Hemmings (Respondent) Strathfield Law Solicitors (Applicants) McPhee Kelshaw Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): 41008 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate