NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Potier v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 204 Hearing dates: 28 July 2011 Decision date: 06 September 2011 Before: Basten JA at 1; Simpson J at 33; Garling J at 46 Decision: Direct that: (1) the folder of materials be amended to remove duplicated material and any material not relied upon (including letters of a procedural kind) and a single typed index identifying each document included; (2) the applicant file and serve a single document containing written submissions prepared by counsel, not to exceed 15 pages in length and not adopting other documents by reference; (3) the respondent file and serve submissions in reply, not to exceed 15 pages in length and not adopting other documents by reference; (4) the matter be listed before the Registrar for directions at 9am on 22 September, 2011. The directions shall include a timetable for the preceding steps. Catchwords: APPEAL - criminal - review of bail application - whether primary judge sitting in Court of Criminal Appeal
CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - bail pending appeal
PROCEDURE - criminal - jurisdiction - constitution of Court of Criminal Appeal - whether primary judge sitting in Court of Criminal Appeal - power of the Court to grant bail - power to review the bail determination of primary judge - Bail Act 1979 (NSW), s 30; Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 3, 22
WORDS & PHRASES - "special and exceptional circumstances" - Bail Act 1979 (NSW), s 30AA Legislation Cited: Bail Act 1979 (NSW), ss 3, 4, 9D, 28, 30, 30AA, 44, 45, 46 Constitution, s 73 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 3, 6, 22 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 189 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 38-41 Cases Cited: Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; 238 CLR 218 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Cassaniti [2006] NSWCCA 335; 204 FLR 152 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Moradian; Saliba and Sparos [2010] NSWCCA 27 Elliott v The Queen [2007] HCA 51; 234 CLR 38 Gallagher v The Queen [1986] HCA 26; 160 CLR 392 Grierson v The King [1938] HCA 45; 60 CLR 431 Marotta v The Queen [1999] HCA 4; 73 ALJR 265 Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35; 167 CLR 259 Petroulias v R [2010] NSWCCA 95 Potier v R [2010] NSWCCA 231 Potier v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 27 R v Burns (1920) 20 NSWSR 351 R v Potier [2005] NSWCCA 336 R v Wilson (1994) 34 NSWLR 1 Regina v JS (No 2) [2007] NSWCCA 309; 179 A Crim R 10 Regina v Potier [2011] NSWCCA 170 Stewart v The King [1921] HCA 17; 29 CLR 234 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Malcolm Huntley Potier - Applicant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate