NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Crouch v Transly Investment Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 1028 Hearing dates: Tuesday, 23 August 2011 Decision date: 23 August 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: White J Decision: Make orders 1, 2 and 3 in the originating process. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up - winding up in insolvency -non-compliance with statutory demand - no application to set aside statutory demand - company cannot dispute the applicants standing as a creditor - presumption of insolvency arising under s 459C, Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - no evidence rebutting presumption of insolvency - winding up order made Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Switz Pty Ltd v Glowbind Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 37; (2000) 48 NSWLR 661 Chief Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Paliflex Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 15; (1999) 17 ACLC 467 State Bank of New South Wales v Tela Pty Limited (No 2) [2002] NSWSC 20; (2002) 188 ALR 702 Bibby Financial Services v Wolf Industries [2004] NSWSC 134; (2004) 49 ACSR 45 Radiancy (Sales) Pty Ltd v Bimat Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 962; (2007) 25 ACLC 1216 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicholas James David Crouch as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Minh Chanh Tran (Plaintiff) Transly Investment Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: G George (Plaintiff) P Le (Defendant) Pateman Legal (Plaintiff) Le Vaccaro Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/81583
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate