NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd v Profilio (RLD) [2011] NSWADTAP 39 Hearing dates: 29 June 2011 Decision date: 07 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel - Internal Before: D Patten, Deputy President P Molony, Judicial Member M Lonie, Non-judicial Member Decision: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Orders made by Tribunal set aside. 3. In lieu, order that the application be dismissed. 4. Subject to 5, no order as to costs. 5. Leave to the appellant to apply for an order for costs within 21 days accompanied by written submissions. Respondents to reply within 21 days, thereafter matter of costs to be decided on the papers. Catchwords: Whether lease breached - No breach established Cases Cited: B & B Constructions v Cheeseman (1994) 35 NSWLR 227 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW [1981-1982] 149 CLR 337 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd (Appellant) Joe Profilio (First Respondent) Rozi Sajko (Second Respondent) Representation: A G Rogers (Appellant) Klonis & Co. Lawyers (Appellant) Mr J Profilio (First Respondent in person and agent for Second Respondent) File Number(s): 119006 Decision under appeal Citation: Profilio v Coogee Bay Village Pty Ltd [2009] NSWADT 211 Date of Decision: 2009-08-10 00:00:00 Before: Retail Leases Division File Number(s): 085127
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate