NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Derek Heelan v Cupton Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 1053 Hearing dates: 2 May 2011, 3 May 2011, 4 May 2011, 5 May 2011, 5 July 2011 Decision date: 14 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Sackar J Decision: See paragraph 100 of Judgment Catchwords: Equitable Interest in Property - Resulting Trust - Constructive Trust - Constructive Trust Based on Unconscionability - Bona fide purchaser for value without notice -Indefeasibility under the Real Property Act 1900 - Dishonest and fraudulent design Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 Corporations Act 2011 Cases Cited: Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 Pettitt v Pettitt [1968] 1 All ER 1053 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Aberdeen Town Council v Aberdeen University (1877) 2 App Cas 544 Randall v Errington (1805)10 Ves 423 Souter v Souter [1923] NZLR 1078 Clay v Clay (2001) 202 CLR Williams v Scott 20 NSWLR 102 Re James [1949] SASR 143 Farah Constructions v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 236 ALR 209 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Muschinski v Dood (1985) 160 CLR 583 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22 Texts Cited: J D Heydon, M J Leeming (2006), Jacobs Law of Trusts, Lexis Nexus, Australia Category: Principal judgment Parties: Derek Heelan and Ors - plaintiffs Cupton Pty Limited and Ors - defendants Representation: Counsel G Stewart, P Beale - plaintiffs P Menadue - first and second defendants Solicitors Patrick J Gentile Solicitors - plaintiffs Penman Solicitors - defendants File Number(s): 2010/152804
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate