NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: HEARSE & ANOR v STAUNTON & ORS [2011] NSWSC 1065 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 12 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hall J Decision: On the application of the third, fourth and fifth defendants, order the plaintiffs to pay the costs of third, fourth and fifth defendants on the ordinary basis (UCPR 42.2) up until 7 April 2010 and thereafter are to pay the costs of those defendants on an indemnity basis (UCPR 42.15A) Catchwords: COSTS - application for indemnity costs - Offer of Compromise (Rule 20 UCPR) - Calderbank offers - whether offer contained real and genuine element of compromise - defendant offer - whether "walk away" offer a valid offer Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] All ER 333 Hearse & Anor v Staunton & Ors [2010] NSWSC 954 Hobartville Stud Pty Limited v Union Insurance Co Limited (1991) 25 NSWLR 358 Macquarie Radio Network Pty Limited v Arthur Dent (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 339 Melchior & Ors v Sydney Adventist Hospital Limited & Anor (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 65 The Anderson Group Pty Limited v Tynan Motors Pty Limited (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 120 Tickell v Trifleska Pty Limited (1990) 25 NSWLR 353 Category: Costs Parties: Phillip Baden HEARSE & ANOR v Dennis Michael STAUNTON & ORS Representation: P: R W Tregenza 3-5D: G Curtin SC P: Lander & Lander 3-5D: Henry Davis York File Number(s): 2006/262913
Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate