NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Martin v State of New South Wales (No 5) [2011] NSWCA 280 Hearing dates: 6 September 2011 Decision date: 06 September 2011 Before: Basten JA at 1; Handley AJA at 5 Decision: Refuse application to dismiss the notice of motion brought by Highlake Resources Pty Ltd on the ground of lack of standing. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - appeal - standing - application to dismiss strike out of appeal on motion of party lacking standing - whether grantee of licence which had since been assigned to third party retains standing to resist appeal from judgment below Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: In all matters:
Anthony Gilbert Martin - Applicant State of New South Wales - First Respondent Highlake Resources Pty Ltd - Second Respondent Mr Ross Savas - Third Respondent Mrs Kaylene Savas - Fourth Respondent
In matter 2011/84040:
Central West Scientific Pty Ltd - Fifth Respondent Tellus Resources Ltd - Sixth Respondent Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate