NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barlaw Pty Limited t/as Barrak Lawyers v Chikal Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 283 Hearing dates: 5 September 2011 Decision date: 05 September 2011 Before: Campbell JA; Macfarlan JA Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: APPEAL - leave to appeal - costs - where comparatively small amount of costs - where complex factual background - where no question of general public interest - where areas of factual dispute not resolved - where new argument raised in oral submissions Category: Principal judgment Parties: Barlaw Pty Limited t/as Barrak Lawyers (Applicant) Chickal Pty Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel M A Robinson (Applicant) P J Bambagiotti (Respondent) Solicitors Barrack Lawyers (Applicant) Beston Macken & McManis (Respondent) File Number(s): 2010/359687 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: Chikal Pty Limited v Youssef El Bayeh [2011] NSWSC 230 Date of Decision: 2011-03-30 00:00:00 Before: Slattery J File Number(s): 2010/359687
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate