NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Eastmark Holdings Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 1084 Hearing dates: 6 Sept 2011; 13,14 Sept 2011 (written submissions) Decision date: 15 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Barrett J Decision: Amount of statutory demand reduced Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - application for order setting aside - strata scheme owners corporation serves statutory demand in respect of various levy amounts said to be due by single proprietor of several lots - payment of part of total indebtedness made shortly before service of demand - proprietor says that that payment was effectively appropriated by it to identified debts in the levy notices - where payment was made at a post office held out by the owners corporation as a place at which payments could be made - where owners corporation allocated money otherwise than according to the appropriation the proprietor claims was made - whether plausible contention requiring further investigation regarding effective appropriation and authority of post office to receive communication thereof - held yes - whether in the overall context it was unconscionable for owners corporation to serve the statutory demand - held no - whether a "defect" in the demand - held no - amount of demand to be reduced Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 459G, s 459H, s 459J Cases Cited: Arcade Badge Embroidery Co Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2005] ACTCA 3; (2003) 157 ACTR 22 Cory Bros & Co Ltd v The SS Mecca [1897] AC 286 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Broadbeach Properties Pty Ltd [2008] HCA 41; (2008) 237 CLR 473 Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Global Paving Pty Ltd v TJM Operations Pty Ltd [2011] VSC 190 Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas & Fuel Corporation Superannuation Fund (1996) 70 FCR 452 Hall Brothers Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 62 FCR 302 KW & KM Quinn Investments Pty Ltd and Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2004] QCA 91 Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 24; (2005) 53 ACSR 229 NA Investments Holdings Pty Ltd v Perpetual Nominees Ltd [2010] NSWCA 210; (2010) 79 ACSR 544 Portrait Express (Sales) Pty Ltd v Kodak (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1996) 132 FLR 300 Spacorp Australia Pty Ltd v Myer Stores Ltd [2001] VSCA 89; (2001) 19 ACLC 1270 Texts Cited: The Laws of Australia, paragraph 7.5.290 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eastmark Holdings Pty Limited - Plaintiff The Owners - Strata Plan No 74602 - Defendant Representation: J M White - Plaintiff A P Lo Surdo - Defendant Blake Dawson - Plaintiff Mills Oakley - Defendant File Number(s): 2011/00023618 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate