NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Welker & Ors v Rinehart [2011] NSWSC 1094 Hearing dates: 9 September 2011 Decision date: 13 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: Brereton J Decision: Suppression order made pursuant to (NSW) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010, s 7, upon the ground referred to in s 8(1)(a), and the ground referred to in s 8(1)(e), prohibiting the disclosure, by publication or otherwise, of any information as to the relief claimed, or any pleading, evidence or argument filed, read or given in, the proceedings. Pursuant to s 9(4), this order does not prohibit disclosure or publication of this judgment, nor of orders made in the proceedings. Pursuant to s 11, it is specified that this order applies throughout the Commonwealth. Pursuant to s 12, it is specified that this order operates until the dismissal of the defendant's motion for a stay of the proceedings, and if it is not dismissed until further order of the Court. Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES - Application for suppression order under (NSW) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 - order applied for under s 8(1)(a) as necessary to prevent prejudice to administration of justice, and/or s 8(1)(e) as necessary in the public interest for the order and the public interest significantly outweighs public interest in open justice - test prescribed by Act more stringent than former common law test and that previously contained in (NSW) Civil Procedure Act (2005) s 72 - discussion of authorities - open justice principle liable to yield in circumstances where open justice would defeat the administration of justice - plaintiffs and defendant party to a deed requiring confidential alternative dispute resolution procedures to be adopted before institution of court proceedings - current proceedings arguably contrary to deed and arguably an abuse of process - publication of current proceedings will negate purpose of confidentiality provision - suppression order necessary to prevent prejudice to administration of justice and to uphold legal rights of litigants - balancing exercise required - weight accorded to public interest in open justice liable to vary according to nature and stage of proceedings - current proceedings concern family trust - private issues and interests concerned - public interest in vindicating private rights outweighs significantly public interest in open justice - fact proceedings may jeopardise commercial negotiations with third parties not a reason in and of itself to depart from principle of open justice - order to apply throughout the Commonwealth - order made at least until defendant's stay application dealt with. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s71, s 72 (NSW) Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010, s 3, s 7, s 8, s 11, s 12, (CTH) Family Law Act 1975, s 121 Cases Cited: Ashington Capital Ltd v Noosa Venture 1 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 639 Chappell v TCN Channel 9 Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 153 Dance with Mr D Ltd v Dirty Dancing Investments Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 332 John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd and Another v District Court of New South Wales and Others (2004) 61 NSWLR 344 John Fairfax Group Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) and Another v Local Court of New South Wales and Others (1991) 26 NSWLR 131 Global Partners Fund Ltd v Babcock & Brown Ltd (in liq) [2010] NSWCA 196 Raybos Australia Pty Ltd v Jones (1985) 2 NSWLR 47 State of New South Wales and Others v Banabelle Electrical Pty Ltd and Others (2002) 54 NSWLR 503 The Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v The Magistrates' Court of Victoria and Others [1999] VSC 232 W v M [2009] NSWSC 1084 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Welker & ors (plaintiffs) Rinehart (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A. J. Sullivan QC with Mr E. C. Muston (defendant/applicant) Mr A. S. Bell SC (plaintiff/respondent) Mr A. T. S. Dawson (intervening media interests) Solicitors: Johnson Winter & Slattery (plaintiff) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (defendant) Addissons (intervening media interests) File Number(s): 2011/00285907
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate