NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Devic v NRMA Insurance Limited [2011] NSWSC 1099 Hearing dates: 8 March 2011 Decision date: 15 September 2011 Before: McCallum J Decision: Summons dismissed with costs Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - application for order in the nature of certiorari - jurisdictional error - error of law on the face of the record - irrelevant consideration - constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction - assessment by Review Panel of permanent impairment under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 - Motor Accidents Authority Permanent Impairment Guidelines - measurement of impairment of injured shoulder using contralateral uninjured shoulder as baseline - adequacy of reasons - whether plaintiff denied procedural fairness due to insufficient transparency in clinical findings as to injury to cervical spine Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Cases Cited: Campbelltown City Council v Vegan [2006] NSWCA 284; (2006) 67 NSWLR 372 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 NRMA Insurance Limited v Ainsworth [2011] NSWSC 344 Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Plaintiff M106 of 2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 32 Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1985] FCA 47; (1985) 6 FCR 155 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission [1986] HCA 54; (1986) 161 CLR 141 Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57; (2005) 221 ALR 402 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Milena Devic (plaintiff) NRMA Insurance Ltd (first defendant) Motor Accidents Authority of NSW (second defendant) MAS Review Panel constituted pursuant to s 63 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 in MAS matter no. 2009/02/2110 (third defendant) Representation: B Nolan (for the plaintiff) W Fitzsimmons (for the first defendant) NSW Compensation Lawyers (for the plaintiff) Curwoods Lawyers (for the first defendant) Crown Solicitor's Office (submitting appearance for the second and third defendants) File Number(s): 2010/267773 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate