NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ABI v Boral Australia Gypsum Ltd t/as Boral Plasterboard [2011] NSWADT 225 Hearing dates: 17 and 18 February; 7 March 2011 Decision date: 21 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equal Opportunity Division Before: J Needham SC, Deputy President A Lowe, Non judicial member E Hayes, Non judicial member Decision: 1.The Tribunal orders:- a) dismiss that part of the claim which deals with direct discrimination; b) dismiss that part of the claim which deals with victimisation. Catchwords: Disability discrimination - anonymisation due to community attitude to Hepatitis C Disability discrimination in employment - stood down on medical grounds - return to work plan - whether delayed on grounds of discriminatory treatment Victimisation - treatment after making claim benefitted applicant - whether victimisation Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1977 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Corrective Services v. Aldridge, [2000] NSWADTAP 5 State Transit Authority v. Sloey [1999] NSWSC 47 Purvis v. New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92 Laycock v. Commissioner of Police [2006] NSWADT 261 Penhall-Jones v. State of NSW [2007] FCA 925 Nicholls & Nicholls v. Director-General of the Department of Education and Training (no 2) [2009] NSWADTAP 20 Haines v. Leves (1987) 8 NSWLR 442 Category: Principal judgment Parties: ABI (Applicant) Boral Australian Gypsum Limited (Respondent) Representation: Counsel P Thew (Respondent) Surry Hills Legal Centre (Applicant) Herbert Geer (Respondent) File Number(s): 101093 Publication restriction: Section 75 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 applies
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate